This case in is VA:
The trustee of a particular case has a ton of evidence that the debtor is lying under oath as she asks her questions about various things at the first meeting with the creditors (ex. the debtor claims they do not have things that the trustee has a picture of). And the debtor claimed to be unemployed but when specifically asked about whether she works for a specific company she comes clean and says yes she does. The trustee asked her to ammend her papers to state that and a few other things she got caught trying to leave out of the case.
There is a lot that this debtor still lied about under oath that the trustee knows is a lie though.
My question is: Why didn't the trustee show her that she knows she is lying? Is she waiting until she goes in front of a judge? Will this person have a second meeting with the creditors because she had to change some things on her case?

