For California...
"On April 30, 2008, the Court ordered child support was based upon the guidelines with the mother's income imputed at $2639 per month and 80% custody; and father's employer provided income of $8835 per month and 20% custody.
While mother's financial situation remains unchanged, the father's employer now reports income from July 2008 and June 2009 to be $11,912 per month. In 2009 the father chose to take custody of the child 15% of the year, not 20%. For the first six months of 2010, father has scheduled to see the child <5%. While I (the mother) do not wish to restrict the father to less than 20% custody, I am requesting that the child support amount be greater than the 80/20 guideline so that it is commensurate with the time the father actually has custody.
Attached is a signed and notarized agreement from October 2005, that was executed in order to correct an error on the original MSA that was filed in November 2005 and became effective January 23, 2006. The original MSA had stipulations for the termination of spousal support that were corrected in the October ammendment. I am requesting that the Court accept this agreement and have it included in the MSA.
On February 17, 2008, our child wrote a letter "To whom it may concern" that is now part of the public record. The mother and father reached an agreement without the Court's needing to consider this letter. I request this letter be removed from our file, sealed or destroyed."
Pretend your a judgeWhat do you think? Too bitchy? rambling? anything?

What do you think? Too bitchy? rambling? anything?
