Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default First Offense OVI/DUI

    My question involves criminal law for the state of: OHIO

    Recently charged with 1st OVI/DUI offense. The officer also charged me for "failing to stay in marked lanes". However, the officer NEVER pulled me over. He must have seen me on when I turned onto a local road. I was on a 35 mph road for 1/2 mile, and had to make a sharp right turn into my driveway, which is all gravel and uneven. I drove to the end of my driveway, turned off my engine, locked the door, stepped out of my vehicle and only then did I see a police car at the road with its lights on. Shortly after that, I saw the officer approaching me on the driveway and he asked what I was doing there. I guess that's when he noticed that I was not stone cold sober.

    Is this a proper police stop? If he had reasonable suspicion, he had about a half of a mile to stop me on the road, but chose not to. Is this a big hole in the prosecution's case? What are the chances that I will get a reduction based on this, that is, if it is truly an improper police stop. He never "stopped me!"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: First Offense OVI/DUI

    What would make it an improper stop? What makes you think that the officer can't wait until you stop by yourself, or can't investigate you after you do so?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,835

    Default Re: First Offense OVI/DUI

    Quote Quoting sadmickey
    View Post
    Is this a proper police stop? If he had reasonable suspicion, he had about a half of a mile to stop me on the road, but chose not to. Is this a big hole in the prosecution's case? What are the chances that I will get a reduction based on this, that is, if it is truly an improper police stop. He never "stopped me!"
    If he never stopped you, why are you asking if it was a proper police stop?

    Stopping a motor vehicle is a seizure, no question. Since you were not pulled over, no seizure took place there.

    Next we look at the approach of the officer after you exited the car.

    If you were charged with a traffic violation, then he witnessed it. There is no case law that states an officer must pull you over contemporaneously. He can even cite you at a later time, as in Ohio there is a 6 month statute of limitations on a Minor Misdemeanor, which the lane violation charge probably is. That was sufficient cause to approach you, period, abesnt any other suspicious behavior, so the DUI is valid.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Drunk and Impaired Driving: Are You Charged With a Second Offense DUI if the First Offense is Reduced
    By bowtie3d in forum Drunk and Impaired Driving Charges
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-07-2011, 11:27 AM
  2. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: First Offense Burglary Charge; Second Offense Theft
    By needhelp29 in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-02-2011, 11:45 AM
  3. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: First Offense
    By jazzy101 in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 07:52 PM
  4. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: First Offense In New York, Second Offense 10 Years Ago In New Jersey
    By bennyjake in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-22-2008, 07:28 AM
  5. Minor in Possession: First Offense MIP
    By alen in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-30-2006, 08:49 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources