He seems to want it both ways - to have visitation rights, but no obligation to pay support. Given a choice, he seems to favor the money over the child.
In the U.K. last year the results of a study on certain genetic abnormalities, based upon the testing of parents and their newborn babies, revealed a 20% nonpaternity rate - among married couples. The study did not reveal nonpaternity to the parents, but it does highlight a significant problem.
Apparently non-paternity wasn't an issue until paternity-fraud-victim decided to make it an issue, and decided to pursue a DNA test on his own initiative. The motive again seems financial, as that was clearly not something done for the benefit of the child.
If paternity-fraud-victim wants to put his pocketbook before his relationship with a child he had previously treated as his own, or makes his love contingent on DNA test results, that's his business. But no, don't ask me to approve.

