Results 1 to 10 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,592

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    If you are reading from your deed, the Grantor is the person who sold it to you and that person is named in the deed as the Grantor and you are named as the Grantee.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    jk is right, the original owner owned both lots at one time. However, since that time, he has retained ownership of the landlocked lot, and sold the one with the easement. I bought it from the second owner. If I understand you correctly, LandSurveyor, the second owner is now the Grantor and I am the Grantee. The original owner is no longer involved in the easement agreement. Is that right?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38,867

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    there is only one grantor and that is the person who granted the easement to the grantee. The guy that owned both lots is both.

    He granted the easement to himself.

    there are no subsequent grantors or grantees. Only the original parties are involved.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    I'm trying to understand my position here . . . There is no language ("in perpetuity", etc) in the deed to make this easement survive a subsequent deed for the original grantor.

    He was not involved in the transaction between myself and the second owner. His name is no longer on the deed. How can the original owner have any rights to the easement in a deed in which he was not involved?

    I understand jk's point that according to the deed, the grantor is also the grantee, because he is granting it to himself. My reading is that the second owner is now the grantor and grantee. Does that make sense?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38,867

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    Does that make sense?
    No.

    there is only 1 grantor and 1 grantee. Subsequent owners of the land are not grantors or grantees.


    "THIS CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO, AND GRANTOR HEREBY RESERVES FOR HIMSELF, HIS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, A 15-FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS ACROSS LOT ##, AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE-REFERENCE PLAT."
    See the bolded part? That means (specifically the "assigns" term), all subsequent purchasers of the land are "assigns" and are bound by that easement grant.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    Thanks for all the input. I actually decided to spend some money with an experienced real estate lawyer, and here's the legal opinion in Georgia:

    Easements granted survive any change of ownership of the property, unless extinguished. So, in my case, the original owner still has the easement, along with the second owner, along with any subsequent owners if the language remains in the legal description of the property and is not extinguished by a quit claim deed from each (or is abandoned [not used] for some undefined significant amount of time, like 20 yrs).

    It just doesn't seem right that people who were not a party to my transaction have rights to my land that I did not explicitly grant, but that's the way it is.

    Thanks for all of your help.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38,867

    Default Re: Definition of "Grantor" in Subsequent Sales

    You granted the use when you purchased the land subject to the easement. If you were not aware of the easement, shame on you for failing to do your due diligence and investigating any such encumbrances or encroachments onto property you intend to purchase.


    btw; what you repeated sounds an awful lot like what I told you.

    whoops, I didn't tell you this part though:

    if the language remains in the legal description of the property
    because it isn't true. An easement will continue until such time it is extinguished. If it is not included in a subsequent deed, that does not void the original grant. You take the property subject to all encroachments and documents of public record and an easement, when an actual easement, is recorded in the public records.

    simply leaving it out of a subsequent deed will not extinguish the easement.

    time for a refund from the attorney.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Dismissal: Definition of "Terminated in My Favor"
    By cmre3456 in forum Civil Procedure
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2011, 06:58 PM
  2. Traffic Lane Violations: What is the Definition of "Limited Accesses" and Do Limitations Need Signage
    By marcb in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-05-2011, 06:05 AM
  3. Quiet Enjoyment: Notification Rights, and the Definition of "Clean"
    By inchristtaylor in forum Landlord-Tenant Law
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-11-2009, 09:55 PM
  4. Towing: Car Towed From Condo from a "Sales" Lot Without Proper Signage
    By jtdow40 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-20-2008, 08:37 AM
  5. Weapons Offenses: Definition Of "Fugitive Of Justice", Texas
    By anaweem in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2008, 10:34 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources