Of course he can testify to the presence and her own statements and that is why I said her prior statements can be damning. As to requiring an ID to enter; he can testify that is what he was told or if there is a sign, he can testify to that but unless he observed ID being required, that is all he can testify about that. Even if he observed the action, he can only testify that while he was there, it was required. He cannot testify that it is always required unless he is always there to observe it.
OP is obviously going to be determined to be guilty of something, if it is actually illegal to enter a bar while under 21 or possibly some other law I have not considered, but possessing a fake ID, without the actual fake ID being presented, is going to be tough to prove.
that is why I suggest speaking with an attorney before her hearing. She could hang herself by saying the wrong thing.



