My question involves child support in the State of: Indiana, but the claim is coming from California via the UIFSA "treaty of states."
I was divorced by a woman that kidnapped my daughter twice. This divorce was accomplished in North Carolina. She has since moved to California and has not been working for about a year now, so she wants to overturn the N.C. decision which gave her full custody, and affixed ZERO dollars as my required support. Though I was not required by law to send child support, I sent all my assets and savings over a period of six years. This was over 40, 000 dollars worth of goods, checks for support, ecucational materials, school tuition checks, etc., etc. The court now wants to overturn the N.C. decision and put a financial burden on me, without consideration of money already sent. I need to know if it is not required of them to take into consideration the money I have sent in support over the years, even though I was not required to by law. I do not expect justice from this system that has thrown God's Law out, the constitution out, has legalized all manner of abominations, persecutes Christians and citizens unlawfully, etc. However, there may be some reason to expect at least a degree of decency and fairness (maybe I am dreaming.) Your opinion is gratefully received. Thank you. I have this membership set to receive email from other members, if anyone would like to communicate.

