Results 1 to 10 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Speeding Ticket While Driving Downhill

    My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: CA
    VC 22350

    Doing approx 65 in a 50
    The CHP got me on a downhill around glenwood and seemed like he was pacing me for a few min, but marked that he got me with a radar.
    I saw him the whole time but didn't realize that the speed limit changed from 60 to 50mph

    1. So far i have gone to the hearing and asked for traffic school ( i am not illegible)
    - i was denied my request, so i pleaded not guilty.
    2. Now i am going to try to fight it.
    My 1st step, i plan on sending out an IDR - There are couple of forms that i found on line, is there one that works better then the other?
    This site: http://www.helpigotaticket.com/proc/discover.html recommends a cover letter. Is this "cover letter" really necessary and will it help my case?

    3. As far as i understand i need to send IDR to the district attorney and police dept. Since this was the CHP.. where do i send this to?
    It seems like the contact address is 701 ocean st for both or am i confused?

    4. After this i will try my hand with TBD. As of now my case is scheduled for end of July.. is a month enough time or would it make sense to get an extension?

    Any other pointers on how to go about fighting this?

    thanks

    State of California Highway Patrol: Ofc
    10395 Soquel Dr, Aptos - (831) 662-0511

    actually this looks like the santa cruz chp office

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    LA LA Land
    Posts
    9,170

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    VC 22350
    22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
    Here's how a 22350 works: The officer will testify as to how, when and where he clocked your speed, he will provide calibration certificates to the Radar unit he used as well a documents showing he was trained in the use of Radar. If and when he does that, then the burden to prove that your speed was reasonable and prudent and/or that it did not endanger the safety of persons or property shifts to you. This is where it gets a bit tougher...
    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    I saw him the whole time but didn't realize that the speed limit changed from 60 to 50mph
    65 in 60 is still “Speeding”!

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    My 1st step, i plan on sending out an IDR - There are couple of forms that i found on line, is there one that works better then the other?
    As long as you file a copy of it in court, do the proof of service properly, send it to the proper address, request a witness list, calibration certificates, training certificates, then the rest is just gravy...

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    3. As far as i understand i need to send IDR to the district attorney and police dept. Since this was the CHP.. where do i send this to?
    Go to the CHP website and get the address from there. Once you've done that, you can call them to verify that the citing officer works out of that office.

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    4. After this i will try my hand with TBD.
    So what are you going to argue in your TBD? Feel free to post it here for comments but keep in mind that “Oops I didn't know the speed limit changed” will not work and neither will “I wasn't eligible for traffic school so I decided to fight it”.

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    As of now my case is scheduled for end of July..
    So you've plead “not guilty” you have a trial date set, but you're gonna do a TBD? Did you post bail yet?

    It doesn't make much of a difference but why did you not request the TBD when you plead at your arraignment?

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    is a month enough time or would it make sense to get an extension?
    If your case is scheduled for trial then its too late for an extension... However, at the time when you request the TBD then you will be given some additional time before you have to submit the declaration... That should give you some more time as well.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    okay so i got my IDR back.... what i got back is linked here. Can i use any of this info to my advantage?

    My trial is on next wed and i still havn't done a TBD, does it even make sense to ask for tbd at this point?





  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    LA LA Land
    Posts
    9,170

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    okay so i got my IDR back.... what i got back is linked here. Can i use any of this info to my advantage?
    Item 1... Not sure what that has to do with your citation...
    Item 2... Tells you to get a copy of the speed survey from the court... But since you haven't done that, there's no way to tell if the 50mph limit is justified.
    Item 3... I don't think a speedometer can be any more accurate...
    Item 4... I can't read his writing... The only part I can make out is "... paced at 65...".... Seems to match what he cited you for.

    Quote Quoting oraph
    View Post
    My trial is on next wed and i still havn't done a TBD, does it even make sense to ask for tbd at this point?
    Not sure what you could really argue in court or in a TBD for that matter... You stated that you'd seen him but was unaware that the limit had dropped to 50 from 60... And even if it hadn't, you were clearly driving at 65 which is above the limit.

    You can try and argue that by driving at 65, you didn't endanger anyone/anything but you have not stated anything so far that supports that argument and honestly, I don't see why or how the judge will buy that.

    Others might disagree...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,622

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Of course I disagree with That Guy. His thought for a valid defense is way too shallow. I think you have an excellent chance of beating this ticket.

    OK... time for a rant... This is exactly what I am talking about when I say that sending a IDR to the police is bad strategy. By law, the DA is REQUIRED to provide you with discovery as he is the prosecuting attorney. The cop who shows up is merely a witness. There is no statutory, regulatory or any other requirement for them to provide you with anything. That's why they can get away with just saying "go find the speed survey on your own"!! There is no legal recourse for the cop not providing you complete discovery as he is not required to provide it in the first place!! So, as far as you know, you could go get the survey, build a defense and the cop shows up with a more recent survey. Also, he doesn't have to tell the truth in his response to the IDR as it is not really discovery.... it is just some information he sent you. There is no legal requirement for him to be factual. As you see, he marked the ticket saying he got you on radar. However, the discovery response says he paced you. So, you need to establish he was using radar. Does the ticket have the radar unit number?? Keep in mind that even if he did pace you, as soon as he turned on the radar, all of the speed trap laws came into play. Read Earnest. I'm going to continue this post assuming that radar was actually used. If you have doubts, we can discuss that seperately.

    First thing you should do is get the survey if you can. You need to understand what it is you are looking for. You are looking for the 85th percentile speed, or the critical speed at the point where the ticket says you were speeding (not where you got pulled over). If the that speed is more than 5mph above 50mph, you should be a winner! Now, as you described a speed limit changing from 60 to 50, I'd bet you a soda that the speed limit is NOT justified.

    When the trial starts, your first motion is that the judge dismiss the case. You can show your letter and say that the prosecution did not provide you with the survey as requested, so it must be excluded from evidence. And, without the survey, the prosecution cannot make a prima facie case as per 40803(b). He will likely say that since he

    If that fails, see if he brought his survey into court. The cop has to bring in a survey. If he does not, you should move for dismissal based on 40803(b). He cannot simply say that it is on file. Read Difiore. If he does have the survey and he says it justifies the limit, challenge him (especially if you know it doesn't). Make him point out exactly what the critical speed is at the location of the violation. Make sure he is doing it correctly because many of these guys have no clue what they are talking about. Read this thread.

    If the speed trap defense doesn't work, you can try the 30 question defense.


    Make sure you understand your defense before going to court. Don't think you will just be able to suggest something and the court will understand what you are talking about. You may have to educate the court AND the cop.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    LA LA Land
    Posts
    9,170

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Quote Quoting EWYLTJ
    View Post
    I'm going to continue this post assuming that radar was actually used.
    The letter from the CHP as well as the officer's notes on the back of the citation ~as far as I can see~ refer to a "pace"... So if the officer is testifying about a "PACE", there goes your Radar defense.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    625

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Quote Quoting That Guy
    View Post
    Not sure what you could really argue in court or in a TBD for that matter... You stated that you'd seen him but was unaware that the limit had dropped to 50 from 60... And even if it hadn't, you were clearly driving at 65 which is above the limit.

    You can try and argue that by driving at 65, you didn't endanger anyone/anything but you have not stated anything so far that supports that argument and honestly, I don't see why or how the judge will buy that.

    Others might disagree...
    you don't argue anything - make sure you write in your current mailing address. the only thing you put in the statement of facts is "i'm not guilty." If the officer doesn't send in his reply, you win. If he does, you will lose the TBD, but you will be able to go down to the court and get a copy of the officer's declaration, which will help tremendously in defending against a VC22350 charge.

    Quote Quoting sniper
    View Post
    IMO, Hwy 17 needs to be retired, or at least, improved considerably. What a horrible roadway.
    There's nothing wrong with highway 17 except that it has no regulatory sign prohibiting morons who can't drive from going there.

    As for the OP, his only defense is that the speed of 65mph was safe/reasonable and did not endanger any persons or property. Pacing throws out the radar defenses, but those don't work 99% of the time anyway.

    Let's get some details. What vehicle do you drive, and what was the speed of other traffic (if any)? Also, can you link the exact section of highway 17 where you were paced along with the direction? Highway 17 is an extremely dynamic road, and 15 over the limit may be OK in some places and dangerous in others.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Speeding Ticket on 17

    Ok so here are the details...
    I am a man btw..

    I dont have a way to scan my ticket in to a computer here at work.. but:
    the cop marked radar/ lidar unit part with an x, then there is a line though the the words radar lidar unit and a 4 digit number on the line.
    I assumed the 4 digit number was a radar unit number. It's possible it was the car number and he put the line though the radar/lidar unit because he made a mistake.

    Part of the problem is that i had a BMW M3 at the time.. and that car seemed to be a magnet for cops like shiny things for crows.
    he wrote: 17 NB from N of glenwood to (what looks like)Casadll17 (Not sure what this is supposed to be as his handwriting is horrible)
    this happened at 12am and there were no other cars on the road.

    i wasn't charged with any construction zone violation, but one of the lanes was blocked off with cones for about 200 yards, even though there was no work being done at the time.

    Quote Quoting EWYLTJ
    View Post

    When the trial starts, your first motion is that the judge dismiss the case. You can show your letter and say that the prosecution did not provide you with the survey as requested, so it must be excluded from evidence. And, without the survey, the prosecution cannot make a prima facie case as per 40803(b). .[/URL]
    So am i to understand that the cop must provide the road survey?
    the responce i got from the CHP as seen on the 2nd scan i provided on line C.
    "A copy of the most recent raod survey can be obtained from the SCC sup court"
    Does this mean that they have to provide me with the survey but they chose not to? i only got the response from CHP by the way, got nothing back from the district attorney.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Speeding Tickets: Speeding Ticket While Going Downhill, VC 22350
    By koutarou in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 02-08-2012, 01:15 PM
  2. Speeding Tickets: Speeding Ticket While Driving Big Rig
    By raja209 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-20-2011, 05:25 PM
  3. Speeding Tickets: Ticketed for Speeding at the End of a Downhill Slope
    By stochastic21 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-10-2010, 01:23 PM
  4. Speeding Tickets: 30% Incline Downhill Speeding Ticket
    By element256 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 10:46 AM
  5. Speeding Tickets: Speeding Ticket Due To Downhill Acceleration
    By Sunny3000 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-07-2008, 12:51 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources