Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    baton rouge, louisiana
    Posts
    5

    Angry Car Searched After Stop for a Noise Violation

    Hi guys. This is my situation: I got pulled over for loud music, the officer swore up and down he smelled marijuana, i denied of course becuase i REALLY was only smoking a cigar! He says he will go easy on me if i give up the marijuana, when i tell him there is none, he gets me out of the car and checks my pockets and discovers 3 lortabs,in which i truely forgot were in my pants when i put them on before i left the house!He places me under arrest for possesion and tickets me for the noise violation. Well, when i read the police report it mentions NOTHING about marijuana!! He states:"I placed Mr.
    Anonymous under arrest for the loud music violation and while conducting a routine body search found what appeared to me as the drug,lortab.
    Does this sound like bullshit or what? He's trying to cover up the illegal search and seizure(becuase there was no marijuana) by saying he searched me because i was under arrest! But who gets arrested for loud music? It's not like i kept the music up. I turned it down immediatly when i saw him and then he followed me for half a mile with the music down before he stopped me!
    Anyone got any helpful info or thoughts no this issue for me? It will be much appreciated. thanks

    signed,
    Mr. Anonymous

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toledo, OH
    Posts
    16,307

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    You were busted fair and square on the noise violation - the officer isn't required to let you go simply because you turned it down as soon as you saw him. I expect he followed you for a bit to take the time to run your plates before stopping you. Nothing illegal about that.

    Aas for the search, if the cop smelled pot, he had probable cause to search. That he found something other than what he was searching for is irrelevant - toting hydrocodone around is just as illegal as pot, he's not required to ignore one illegal substance simply because he was looking for another.

    If the order of events in the report is different from your own recollections, you might consider consulting an attorney in your area.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,835

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting jaegermonster
    View Post
    Hi guys. This is my situation: I got pulled over for loud music, the officer swore up and down he smelled marijuana, i denied of course becuase i REALLY was only smoking a cigar! He says he will go easy on me if i give up the marijuana, when i tell him there is none, he gets me out of the car and checks my pockets and discovers 3 lortabs,in which i truely forgot were in my pants when i put them on before i left the house!He places me under arrest for possesion and tickets me for the noise violation. Well, when i read the police report it mentions NOTHING about marijuana!! He states:"I placed Mr.
    Anonymous under arrest for the loud music violation and while conducting a routine body search found what appeared to me as the drug,lortab.
    Does this sound like bullshit or what? He's trying to cover up the illegal search and seizure(becuase there was no marijuana) by saying he searched me because i was under arrest! But who gets arrested for loud music? It's not like i kept the music up. I turned it down immediatly when i saw him and then he followed me for half a mile with the music down before he stopped me!
    Anyone got any helpful info or thoughts no this issue for me? It will be much appreciated. thanks

    signed,
    Mr. Anonymous

    IF the loud music was an arrestable offense, and you were indeed arrested for it, then he can search your pockets as incident to an arrest.

    Simply smelling MJ may create authority for a passenger compartment search, however it would not give the officer cause to search in your pockets until such was found in the compartment, which is why he articulated the specific arrest for the loud music.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    20,594

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting BOR
    View Post
    Simply smelling MJ may create authority for a passenger compartment search, however it would not give the officer cause to search in your pockets until such was found in the compartment, which is why he articulated the specific arrest for the loud music.
    Smelling marijuana in the car is almost certainly going to justify a search of the person, too. It is reasonable to assume that indicia of smoking marijuana will be on the individual and not just inside the car. Most people stash their dope on their person, not in the car.

    Now, if I smelled marijuana in the car, and the driver got out and smelled like lilac and roses, I might have a harder time articulating that, but I doubt that is ever going to be the case.

    - Carl

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,835

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting cdwjava
    View Post
    Smelling marijuana in the car is almost certainly going to justify a search of the person, too. It is reasonable to assume that indicia of smoking marijuana will be on the individual and not just inside the car. Most people stash their dope on their person, not in the car.


    - Carl
    I went back and checked for my state. It only stated a trunk search is NOT permissable for the smell of MJ, but a passenger compartment search is.

    It did not mention a search of the person though. You are equating the automobile exception to the person search right?

    Say a person were walking down the street and passsed an officer and the person smelled like MJ, that would not justify a warrantless search, right?

    This is not the case I mentioned, but the OSC did resolve an appeals court conflict on it:


    http://www.supremecourtofohio.gov/ro...00-ohio-10.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    20,594

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting BOR
    View Post
    I went back and checked for my state. It only stated a trunk search is NOT permissable for the smell of MJ, but a passenger compartment search is.

    It did not mention a search of the person though. You are equating the automobile exception to the person search right?
    If probable cause extends to the person, absolutely. It is not the car smoking the dope, it is the person smoking dope IN the car. Allegedly.

    Say a person were walking down the street and passsed an officer and the person smelled like MJ, that would not justify a warrantless search, right?
    It might justify such a search, sure. It would certainly justify a detention for further investigation.

    - Carl

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,835

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Hey Carl, here is the trunk case I mentioned first, it also cites Moore, which I should have remembered.

    ..Odor of marijuana gave rise to probable cause for warrantless search of interior of vehicle but not its trunk..


    http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod...-ohio-3255.pdf

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    20,594

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    The applicability of that case and even Moore would depend on the state the OP is in. Since he appears to be from LA, anything can be the case.

    If smell alone is not sufficient to justify a search in LA, then the search is bad. But, I suspect the officer would have (or should have) know if that was the case. There are a handful of states that do not recognize smell as valid P.C.

    - Carl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,835

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting cdwjava
    View Post
    The applicability of that case and even Moore would depend on the state the OP is in. Since he appears to be from LA, anything can be the case.


    - Carl
    I notice that now, at first I was thinking he was from Ohio, wherever I got that from?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    20,594

    Default Re: Illegal Search

    Quote Quoting BOR
    View Post
    I notice that now, at first I was thinking he was from Ohio, wherever I got that from?
    You wouldn't have been sharing his stash, would you?

    Not like I've never made a similar assumption here ... it happens, and we rarely can recall why ... i can write it off to getting older. Your excuse might be ... ???

    - Carl

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Vehicle Modification: Noise Violation Due to Altered / Modified Exhaust
    By yoareyouserious in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-16-2010, 08:52 PM
  2. Search and Seizure: Pulled Over for Minor Traffic Violation, Police Searched and Seized Marijuana
    By harkoo in forum Criminal Procedure
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-17-2009, 11:24 PM
  3. Nuisance: The City Won't Resolve a Noise Violation by a Business
    By Extra in forum Real Estate Ownership and Title
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-28-2009, 09:55 PM
  4. Drunk and Impaired Driving: Was I Illegally Searched As a Non-Driving Passenger in a DUI Stop
    By Dan1two3 in forum Drunk and Impaired Driving Charges
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-20-2009, 04:42 AM
  5. Disturbing the Peace: Noise Violation in South Orange, New Jersey
    By ColeHamels in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-12-2008, 09:04 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources