The whole holding cell thing IS irrelevant to the case but relevant to let you know just who these guys are....they are just regular people who chose the profession to be an officer...they are not the iconic,pure,law bringers that they are made out to be....some are no doubt....but my main concern is with exactly that their are 3(citizens) against 4(officers) people are going to lean to the officers side if all that happens in court is some he said , she said.But i thought they couldnt prosecute without physical evidence....I need something concrete and if i could get me and my witnesses to polygraph i think thats all ill need or maybe even the officers....but im highly doubtful they will agree to it...I call my lawyer once a day and leave a message i can NEVER contact him and pre-trial is on the 23rd of this month....and even if and only IF i had bit a cop for no apparent reasonIm pretty sure their job is to only subdue the suspect and not beat his face into the ground and taze him after he is laying face first on the ground cuffed and not moving OR making any noise....there is ABSOLUTELY no way to justify that....
EDIT:also for the whole more than im letting on i had already previously stated i do not have a good criminal record with assault charge on an off duty cop on it and all that plus the bench warrant. id thought about this may be the reason (still dosent justify what they did) that they did this.BUT they didnt have a positive id on me until about 5 hours after the incident.Also saying that we were never tested for intoxication (more than likely because we didnt appear intoxicated) i dont think they can use that against us.Thats why i keep begging for my paper work from my lawyer I need to see what their "claims" are and everything inside the discovery packet, police report, and investigative report myself.
And i should add this before i get bashed for this too..but the assault on the off duty cop ended up getting dropped as it was in self defense.

