My question involves search and seizure law in the State of: MN.

WITH ALL HONESTY MY LAST CONVICTION WAS IN 1995 NO FELONY DRUG CONVICTION NOR VIOLENT FELONIES. HOWEVER 14 YEARS LATER I STILL GET HARASSED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. OVER THE 14 YEARS I OBTAINED 2 DEGREES (ONLY ASSOCIATES) OWN MY OWN HOUSE IN THE BERBS AND OWN 2 RETAIL STORES.

PROBLEM: THE POLICE RAIDED MY STORE AND MY HOME AT THE SAME TIME USING THE SAME WORDING FOR ALL 3 AFFIDAVITS TO GET THE SEARCH WARRANTS. THE DETECTIVE CLAIMED THAT HE HAS A CI (RELIABLE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT) THAT WITNESSED ME WITH KILOS OF COCAINE AND A KILO PRESS WITHIN MY STORE & PAST CRIMINAL RECORD.

IN SHORT NO DRUGS WERE FOUND AT ANY LOCATION NOT EVEN A ZIP LOCK BAG. NOR ANYTHING DRUG RELATED. SCALES, PRESSES ETC... HOWEVER A FIREARM WAS RECOVERED AND I WAS CHARGED FOR IT DUE TO BEING A FELON.

CONSEQUENTLY MY STORES WERE COMPLETELY DESTROYED! WHEN THEY DID THE SEARCH THEY SNATCHED MY ALARMS OFF THE WALL, DESTROYED MY MERCHANDISE TO THE POINT I COULD NOT SELL IT. THE STORES LOOKED LIKED A TRASH HEAP. LITERALLY!!!! FURTHERMORE AFTER I POSTED BAIL THEY WOULD JUST SIT IN FRONT OF MY STORES KNOCKING ON MY STORE DOORS (I HAD THE DOORS LOCKED TO CLEAN UP THE MESS).

THIS WENT ON EVEN AFTER I OPEN THE STORES AND TRIED TO SELL THE ITEMS THE WOULD POST UP AND HARASS MY PATRONS. CONSEQUENTLY I HAD TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS (BOTH STORES)

THE OUTCOME OF THE CRIMINAL MATTER WAS DISMISSED DUE TO FACT OF PROBABLE CAUSE. MORE IMPORTANTLY THE JUDGE GAVE THE OFFICERS AND THE PROSECUTOR A VERBAL LASHING " I FIRST MAKE THE OBSERVATION THAT, IN GENERAL, THIS AFFIDAVIT IS SERIOUSLY DEFICIENT IN MANY RESPECTS, INCLUDING THE LACK OF SPECIFICITY AND PARTICULARLY AND ASSERTIONS BASED ON CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS AND INNUENDO, RATHER THAN BASED ON FACT. IT'S ALSO -- JUST IN PASSING, I WOULD NOTE IT IS POORLY DRAFTED, INCOMPREHENSIBLE IN PLACES AND REPLETE WITH MISSPELLINGS AND OTHER ERRORS. WHILE I'M VERY CAUTIOUS BEFORE OVERRULING A FELLOW JUDGE, OUR PRACTICE DOES NOT PERMIT A DEFENDANT CHARGED WITH CRIMES BASED ON SARCH WARRANTS TO SEEK FURTHER REVIEW OF THE WARRANT AND, THIS IS ESSENTIALLY A SUBSEQUENT REVIEW OF WHETHER THE FIRST JUDGE ACTUALLY HAD PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE THE WARRANTS BASD ON THE AFFIDAVITS. AND, UPON MY INDEPENDENT REVIEW, I FIND THAT THE WARRANT AFFIDAVIT IS DEFICIENT IN THE PARTICULARS THAT I'VE JUST DESCRIBED AND THAT INSOFAR AS THE AFFIDAVIT WAS USED TO SUPPORT WARRANTS FOR THE SEARCH..... IT IS LEGALY INSUFFICIENT." CASE DISMISSED!




I SPENT MY LIFE SAVINGS ON MY STORES, THEN ALL THE PROFIT THAT I CLOSELY ACCUMULATED FROM THE STORES WAS SPENT ON THE CASE. MY STORES ARE CLOSED MY MONEY GONE BUT I HAVE MY FREEDOM

BUT IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO ABOUT THIS. MY CRIMINAL ATTORNEY SUGGESTED I CONTACT A CIVIL ATTORNEY. EVERY SINGLE CIVIL ATTORNEY I CONTACT WILL NOT TOUCH IT BECAUSE IT IS NOT A PERSONAL INJURY I AM NOT ACTUALLY INJURED. JUST PROPERTY LOSS. (AND EMOTIONALLY DISTRAUGHT AND DEPRESSED)

I CONSIDERED LITIGATING MY OWN 1983 BUT I AM SERIOUSLY CONCERNED ABOUT QUALIFIED AND OFFICIAL IMMUNITY. I KNOW ITS A 4TH AMEND. VIOLATION. DESPITE THE FACT THEY DID HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEARCH MY PROPERTY BUT NOT TO DESTROY MY PROPERTY. SO I AM THINKING UNREASONABLE SEARCH.

I AM AWARE THAT THE COMPLAINT CAUSE OF ACTION HAVE TO BE WORDED CORRECTLY BECAUSE I CAN LOSE REAL QUICK ON A SUMMARY JUDGEMENT.

LOSING MY AMERICAN DREAM AND FAITH
PLEASE HELP