They may or may not call Microsoft (since the case is so old, there's no telling how many different people could have owned/sold it to since then), but what they CAN do now is enter the item as stolen in the NCIC system - which means when an officer runs it, they'll be notified that it has been reported stolen (many agencies have, for instance, pawn shop details where lists of items go to local law enforcement who checks for stolen property).
Police would get the subpoena as part of the criminal investigation. They may or may not be "hip enough" to know to check Gamestop - you could always bring it to their attention as a possible place to check.Gamestop requires a subpoena in order to say if a customer who sold them a unit that was stolen. Would it be silly to get a subpoena for this case? I assume it costs money to issue one in the first place.
Being found guilty of possession of stolen property is more likely than being found guilty of the actual theft, which would be worse for a police career (easy to claim "I didn't know it was stolen"). Which one he'd be arrested under, if any, will depend on what case police can or can't make - which could be different than what he eventually gets charged with by the prosecutor's office - which could be different STILL from what he either pleads to or gets convicted of.On top of all of this, the person I'm entirely positive stole my items wants to be a Pittsburgh police officer. What all would he be charged with if he's found guilty?

