Mr. KnowItAll,
Thank you for your previous post.
Do courts typically make a distinction between necessary items and unnecessary items when determining who pays the debt for community property?
For example, my wife will spend $5 each on several posters of a current "pop-star" knowing that she is just getting herself deeper into debt. Yes, these items are for one of my daughters so I would assume "community" property. But, they aren't necessary to the family so I wouldn't want to be forced to pay for them.
Thank you for your time.

