As a new/young driver I was foolish enough to get a ticket more than 2 years ago, and I used a deferral for that. But for more than two years I've been on top of things and taking any chances at all with speed and/or other negligence on my road.
To answer your first question, the reason I stressed proving the speed part is because really there was no other way that I "supposedly" showed negligence. No swerving or lane changes, and not a single car while I was on that road.
I don't know if this relevant for you, but another reason I stressed the speed is because the officer stated he was confident that I was driving triple he speed limit, which would 100+ mph, and then he says he had to drive 100+ mph just to catch up to me, which to me it didn't make much sense because he wouldn't be able to catch up with me at all if we both drive pretty much at the same speed. Plus given was the wavy road, I cannot even imagine for 100mph to be possible.
What do you think now, since the speed was the only thing mentioned in the notes?
ai2tman

