My question involves landlord-tenant law in the State of: California
I've attempted to research my rights regarding this issue via The Department of Consumer Affairs (http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook), finding nothing regarding Air Conditioning, but only Heating.
The Townhouse that I moved into in June 2007, stated in the advertisement (and lease) that that the building did not have Air Conditioning.
Upon my initial review of the complex I noticed that all the other units DID in fact have Air Conditioning that is functional.
My building DOES have an Air Conditioning unit installed, but does not work. I requested that a Technician examine the unit and he concluded that it would need extensive work, but could be repaired.
The Property Manager for this building insists that because the advertisement (and lease) states that there is NO Air Conditioning that they will not repair the unit.
I feel that this should be repaired and that although it may be somewhat costly that I would be willing to negotiate a deal to have it repaired. I suggested to the PM that I would have it repaired and then request that the Owner deduct the cost over the next 12 months so as to reduce the Shock of the cost. I recognize that there is no statement in the DCA's website referencing my health as a factor of cooling (as opposed to heating). But the temperatures can reach 15 degrees higher than the outdoor temperatures on a hot day, on the 2nd floor of the building. When the temperature is above 85, this can be sweltering.
Questions
1. Can I insist that the repairs be made, even thought the Lease does not state that an Air Conditioning unit exists (contrary to the fact that one does, thought it does not work)?
2. Is it reasonable to request that this item be repaired? (yes this is subjective).

