Dan.
Do you consume illegal drugs? Answer the question!
Danny Danny Danny.....
You are trying too hard again.
Show me where it talks about the UN Charter as supreme to the Constitution in either said Constitution or UN Charter.
Until it does, the contract the US Government has with the UN has no more legally demonstrable status than the contract the US Government has with Kraft Foods supplying the Commissaries.
In fact, less. Because the contract with Kraft, I am sure, outlines penalties involved if either party fails to uphold their end of the contract. The agreement with the UN doesn't.
See Iraq before our present confrontation. They liberally and routinely violated UN resolutions.... and the UN was not only not going to hold their feet to the fire, but had just elected Iraq to head the UN Human Rights council.
Maybe it had something to do with all that Money for Oil, thing? Whatever happened to that, anyway (shameless attempt to hijack thread)?
You have stated this falsehood often.
Prohibition is a form of regulation. You don't like it that it does, but it does.
You can regulate a product out of business. Take a legal drug with a nasty little side effect... like DDT. When the side effects were known, it was banned from the marketplace... via a regulatory body.
Even you have said that it is legal and permissible to ban certain products... I think the example I used was that the right to bear arms doesn not include nukes.
Danny... I know you had a lot of time in lockup to think about this... but it doesn't change anything.
Concerning treaties, Article 6 states: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
I am referring to the legal precedent being established concerning states' rights. The US is establishing that precedent concerning the right of the State of the United States to nullify the duly constituted interstate authority of the UN.