While court records are a matter of public record, there are constraints on the access to this information depending upon the issues and whether or not children are involved.Assuming non-defamatory content, what are the legal limits to what kind of marital data can or can't be published?
If someone is angry after a divorce and publishes personal information in what would be reasonably construed as nothing more than a malicious intent to publicly embarass the other party, that could be a huge legal problem for the person doing this.
There may be more leeway if arguing the judge abused his discretion and one is making a direct point with relevant facts. But one has to be careful going down that path and not release what could be considered irrelevant information.
Yes, the public official generally has a higher burden of proof to establish a cause of action for defamation or emotional damages.Do the rules change for Public Officials and Public Figures versus ordinary citizens?
They will deal with it as they always have, regardless of the medium of communication. First amendment rights offer no protection if the speech recklessly intrudes on a citizens right to privacy.Since Freedom of Speech & Expression are federal rights, how do you believe individual states do/will deal with this?
NODo you believe this will change aspects of the divorce process and/or laws that drive them?

