Quote Quoting jvending980
View Post
Please assume Ohio.

Clearly, it is repeated on here many places that wrongful termination only applies to discrimination protected by law (such as sex, race and age), but I was wondering, under the doctrine of at-will employment, can your boss safely fire you for not breaking the law, a local/state/federal regulation or some other government mandated policy?

For example, say your boss told you he needed to get downtown quick. You got in the company car, and your boss told you to speed. You refused. Your boss missed his meeting, lost a big account and fired you the next day and even gave you a termination letter, referring to your "failure" the day before to deliver him to his meeting on time as the reason you were fired. Do you have a good chance of winning a wrongful termination suit?

If there is any protection for such a termination, how deep does that protection go? In other words, if federal law trumps the at-will doctrine
what about a county ordinance, what about an order from the company president to do something that would make you personally liable to a third party in a civil matter?

You say you live in Ohio? They DO recognize a public policy exception, yes, as many states do. Some research keying in selected terms hit this case. See par. 7 and on, the Greeley case. Par. 8 discusses other PP exceptions in addition to Ohio law, such as the US constitution.There is NO federal law dealing with at will employment, it is an individual state's right to adopt or abrogate at will.


The web site of the OSC, I checked, does not archive opinions before 1992 which Greeley is 1990.

Speeding is against the public policy of any state. If indeed you were terminated for refusing to break the law, no question in your mind, consult an employment law attorney for a case evaluation. Greeley may or may not apply. Don't expect your employer to admit it though IF a possible lawsuit is filed.


http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/ne...-ohio-4921.pdf

Go to a university/college law school law library and ask where you can find this citation (and any other listed) to read first hand.

Or maybe you can pull up Greeley online. I could not find the WHOLE opinion.

Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contrs.,
Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 228, 551 N.E.2d 981


Ohio St., means it was an Ohio Supreme court decision, NOT an Appellate one, 3rd edition, volume 49, page 228.

N.E. stands for North Eastern reporter, 2nd series volume 551, page 981. The case can be found in either series above. It is a series of law volume cases, such as S.E. would be South Eastern reporter. P. would be Pacific reporter.