there have been so many posts about sol, and issues whether it is open or written contract, and also which states sol would prevail, ie the cc companys state or your state, i was wondering if anyone has used just the sol defense, and the judge deny it,based purely on that defense. i mean it seems so clear that the law states a certain timeline you can be sued but the jdb,s and ca continue to sue. even in my case, although i had a sol defense, my attorney used other defenses, so i am not sure which one the judge considered relavent. also in my case the cc agency spent 255 to sue me and when they lost paid my attorney fees, knowing that i was beyond any statute of limitation. why would a rational attoney do that? can a judge disregard a statute? what am i missing here? besides bad spelling and punctuation.

