You're confused??
You know exactly what is going on and blame everyone- "credit card company", "my husband", "his accountant", "book keeper", "THey had full access to the truth, they just didn't look"
First you said "18 months ago, he hits me with the news of us being sued and the amount was $62,000. He told me I was not involved in the law suit since I was not involved in a any way. I am not on that checking account at all, nor was I ever. So for this past year I figured it was HIS problem."
then you say "yesterday that I am being sued along with him because 2 of the checks (over that 8 year period) were written to me (signed by him). So i look like an accomplice."
and you change again to say
"I was originally served as part of the lawsuit last year. Our lawyer was able to get me out of it since I was not associated in any way with the checking account. Apparently, they have recently gotten the records from the bank and can now see where the money went over the past eight years. That is when they saw the two checks written to me, and now are re-adding me into the lawsuit. "
You said you spent the "next 8 years spending this money and ."we were eventually found out"
"Money was coming into our personal checking account from a credit card company, that should have been going into someone elses."
"Instead of calling the new business owner to inform him of the error, we kept quiet and allowed the money to keep coming in."
and "checking account in which the improper funds were being deposited, is owned by someone else."
Your question has been answered several times. The SoL begins with the last time you used this man's money.
Did you know the laws protect victims not perpetrators?Can they get around the statute of limitations in Colorado in a case like this?
The question is CAN YOU GET AROUND the SoL?
You would be best advised by counsel.

