Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: New Work Policy

    Quote Quoting Security Consultant
    View Post
    - You are advised to come to work dressed according to your salary.
    - If we see you wearing Prada shoes and carrying a Gucci bag, we will assume you are doing well financially and therefore do not need a raise.
    - If you dress poorly, you need to learn to manage your money better, so that you may buy nicer clothes, and therefore you do not need a raise.
    - If you dress just right, you are right where you need to be and therefore you do not need a raise.
    Why don't we simply pay people to stay out of the labor market, and let market forces dictate market prices.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    28,906

    Default Re: New Work Policy

    Why don't we not pay people to stay out of the labor market, and let market forces dictate wages? That is, do you believe in market forces (in which case your idea is inconsistent with your beliefs) or not (in which case your idea is silly).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: New Work Policy

    Why do you think market forces would cease to exist, if the public sector competes with the private sector for labor market participants?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    28,906

    Default Re: New Work Policy

    Do you think non sequiturs somehow help your arguments seem more coherent?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: New Work Policy

    Quote Quoting aaron
    View Post
    Do you think non sequiturs somehow help your arguments seem more coherent?
    If the private sector is paying people to participate in the labor market, and the public sector is paying people to not participate in the labor market; why would there not be a form of supply and demand for those labor market participants; similar to what occurs normally, in the markets?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: Failing a Random Drug Test in Massachusetts

    Full compliance with at-will employment doctrine, in my opinion, should allow an individual to quit before being fired for cause, and still be eligible for unemployment benefits.

    It is my further opinion, that full compliance with at-will employment doctrine would provide a safety net for individuals who are not motivated in just any job, or their full time profession (vocation); regardless of circumstances. And, also provide for an employers 9A right to at-will employment, without the additional cost of potential litigation.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    24,521

    Default Re: Failing a Random Drug Test in Massachusetts

    Well, Daniel, your opinion does nothing to answer the poster's question, so it has no relevance here.

    ZP, that's too situation specific to call. I wouldn't count on it, but stranger things have happened. It would be worth your while to apply; the worst that can happen is that you are denied, in which case you are no worse off than if you do not apply at all.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: Failing a Random Drug Test in Massachusetts

    I meant it in the context of forms of administrative law and case law. If enough people start requesting full compliance with at-will doctrine, a measure of democracy can be said to exist; and, a form of democracy may become available for export.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    24,521

    Default Re: Failing a Random Drug Test in Massachusetts

    Take it somewhere else, Daniel - we've heard it from you before, we are not impressed, and frankly we are bored silly with your attempts to work up a debate on the subject. Keep those attempts OUT of the forums where we are TRYING to answer legal questions.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    492

    Default Re: Failing a Random Drug Test in Massachusetts

    Quote Quoting cbg
    View Post
    Take it somewhere else, Daniel - we've heard it from you before, we are not impressed, and frankly we are bored silly with your attempts to work up a debate on the subject. Keep those attempts OUT of the forums where we are TRYING to answer legal questions.
    It is a form of legal theory. Perhaps, you could provide better responses to the actual legal administrative and case law that pertains to it.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Legal Theory And Politics: Nullification And States' Rights
    By danielpalos in forum Debate the Issues
    Replies: 159
    Last Post: 04-25-2008, 09:23 PM
  2. Legal Theory And Politics: Is Dan A Virgin?
    By blueeagle in forum Banter
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-18-2008, 01:59 AM
  3. Legal theory and politics: The Militia and States Rights.
    By danielpalos in forum Debate the Issues
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 09-24-2007, 09:51 AM
  4. Legal theory and politics: The HSA
    By danielpalos in forum Debate the Issues
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 06:34 PM
  5. Unemployment Benefits: Legal Theory and Politics: At-Will Unemployment Compensation
    By danielpalos in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 12:28 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources