Barker v Wingo relates to speedy trial issues. I don't see how it has any bearing on whether or not cwagner118 knew the court made a mistake - cwagner118 admits he knew of a mistake. To the extent that you're arguing that cwagner118 had no duty to correct the mistake himself, I agree, but that's not what was argued.

I doubt that any court would find a "speedy trial" violation based upon a six week delay between the time a ticket was issued and the time court errors were corrected in relation to the prosecution of the ticket.

I think everybody is in agreement that the court made some pretty big errors here, and the license should not have been suspended in this manner.