I do not care how many cases he has tried, he should know that both parties are REQUIRED to make an attempt to settle a case in either courtroom before it is tried. Oh, and I highly doubt he has tried thousands of cases.
You can choose to believe someone because of their title or occupation but it doesn't take a physicist to know the effects of gravity. Also, attorneys can be the last to believe because they often argue out of sport with no regard for right or wrong.
Every case is determined by "evidence," and the one with more "sufficient evidence" usually wins. Also, how can you say the other side is 'ridiculous' when you haven't seen their evidence? You are beginning to sound like a biased juror who knows the verdict before hearing the case.This is not a case of "sufficient evidence" either. The people making claims against the OP are making literally ridiculous claims where no evidence really exists at all.
So your advice is also to ignore them and only offer your evidence in a courtroom? Really? This thing could be settled with one manila envelope, but you would not advise doing it that way?

