Quote Quoting Harold99
View Post
There's absolutely an obligation to make an attempt to settle it before it is heard at trial. Have you ever sued someone in small claims court before? Well, I have, three times in two different courthouses. Each time the judge requires all parties to go outside the courtroom and make one last attempt at settling it before it can be heard in trial.

It is very unlikely that it will be heard in superior court because the OP said it qualifies for small claims court and it's just for therapy. Also, he/she said the other party likely cannot afford attorney costs. Further, in superior court, where I just sued someone, they require an MSC (mandatory settlement conference) before the case is heard in trial. So I don't know how an attorney such as yourself cannot be aware of these court protocols.

What do you mean "there is no obligation for the OP to try settling anything if he doesn't owe it." Huh? That is silly because each party prior to trial believes they "do not owe anything." Have you ever gone to trial knowing that you would lose? Probably not. Besides, if the OP has sufficient evidence that he does not owe it, then he should supply it to the other party to put it to rest...because who wants to be dragged into court to supply it?
Just because a judge gives the parties one more opportunity to settle before hearing the case does not mean that someone is required to try to settle a case. TM has probably litigated thousands more cases than you have.

This is not a case of "sufficient evidence" either. The people making claims against the OP are making literally ridiculous claims where no evidence really exists at all.