You come back with some actual evidence, not just paranoid supposition but real factual evidence, that nothing was considered except what was written down by the reporter; that nothing was edited out for length; that the reporter did not miss or choose to omit anything; that the scientist(s) in truth and fact considered absolutely nothing except what the reporter and his editor chose to include in the news story, and maybe I'll think about reconsidering.

However, until then, based on the fact that I am in a high risk group; that I have no wish to be infected by some looney-tune who thinks his ten minutes of internet surfing is more trustworthy thatn the scientific evidence; that I only this afternoon talked with a friend who almost certainly has Covid-19 and is in such pain that she truly believes she is going to die; you'll have to forgive me if I choose to err on the side of caution.