Quote Quoting determinatio
View Post
I am describing mistaken presupposition entertained by the entire group of persons deeming law to be a causal determinative agent in regard to human conduct.

Your sordid, intolerant, mean, insulting and abusive manner is inacceptable. Why on earth are you so cruel!? You only exhibit your absolute vacuity; shallow mindedness; and hateful personality.

A central portion of the discussion is punishment, which concerns consequences; however, punishment is not actually a consequence of law, for language of law per se is not determinative/originative of human conduct, thus, no person does or can predicate the punishment of another human being upon the language of law. Language of law does not, cannot, course human behavior, thus, law can neither be obeyed, disobeyed, nor broken.



I should use the words I determine to use via my freedom. Like I have said before, no matter what I write, others always decide I should be elsewhere, doing precisely what they think, which, is impossible absent cerebroanastamosis...I am a freedom and you are a prohibitor; in your tyrannical world I am not allowed to do/to be.

This is your response my question your assigning certain traits to a group, which is exactly what you did. My response was not any of the things that you describe it as. It is, in fact questioning your argument. It is not abusive, insulting, intolerant or mean. You, however have hurled insults at my person by calling me shallow, vacuous and hateful. Your need to make us all rude clods and you the aggrieved victim of our loutish behavior is ludicrous in light of your almost constant stream of bile.

As to your referring to Payrolguy as a "prohibitor", well, um...please. Also, you list yourself as a freedom. Does that mean that you elevated above us mere mortals living in the dirt, ascended to a higher plane? You are now an Abstract? An Ideal?

So, use whatever words you choose but, in exercising your perceived rights be aware that you are not protected from the consequences of those words which may be mild, such as you getting heckled, such as what happens here, to perhaps punched in the throat if you chose to spew your particular brand of pseudo-intellectual argle-bargle (a legal/rhetorical concept attributed to Justice Antonin Scalia) in, say, a Trump rally (you'd sound like one of them hated elites we hear so much about and they do hate them elites!). You are only protected from action taken against you by the State by laws derived from the Bill of Rights and Constitution.

So, in my best Grouch Marx impersonation, go away, son, you bother me.