OP lives in a subjective reality. Things are what his mind says they are irrespective of an objective reality where facts are true without interpretation or observation.
OP lives in a subjective reality. Things are what his mind says they are irrespective of an objective reality where facts are true without interpretation or observation.
Mind; subjective reality; facts; objective reality, all are instances of unicorn, of the King of France, of Santa Klaus, and, simply because there are words appearing to refer to such, undiscerning jurisprudentially-oriented persons unthinkingly permit themselves to believe the world actually contains their minds, their subjective and objective realities ; facts; super delusional!
Jurisprudents are so radically established within the biases of their preconceptions that they are hopelessly lost in illusion, such as ''law'', which putatively determines persons to do or not do conduct. cbg is a typical lying dishonorable dupe.
If you duped dupes do not want critical clear thinking on this site simply stop accosting me.
Run away, aurelieus, and let the grown-ups talk.
I will be seventy five in June and hold two degrees in the liberal arts, 1973 and 2007. It is pitiful that not one of you can do more than argumentum ad hominem and, cannot possibly even begin to do rational critique of the OP, for, you big-shot legal minds are pitifully stuck-on-stupid, as mere parrots of legal absurdity; you are only really so many little children who believe in stuff like Santa Claus! Funny. You jurisprudentially-oriented types are not in the least bit toughminded and, all you can do is childish insult, when you are face to face with viable critique of your weltanschauung.
Step-up and do a rational defeat of the OP and, yes, I am unrealistically hoping for more than is possible here, for, none of you can actually think!
Living the lie that is ''law'', day in and day out, has made you professional dupes/liars. Cowards.
I have overthrown your precious notion ''law'' and, there is not a damn thing any of you are capable of doing about it; if you had a shred of honesty and or sense, you would see that you have suffered defease regarding your central mistaken presupposition, i.e., that language of law is somehow determinative of human acts.
It makes no difference attorney or not, you all subscribe to the selfsame nonsense regarding law as a rule/force/determinant, which language of law is not and cannot be.
I merely posited my critique of the notion of law here, and, have been insultingly and senselessly attacked absent provision of any reasoned argument against my position; I did not come here to argue, but to seek consensus; you people attack and I defend via further positing and positing my propositions. Reasoned consensus is my objective, and, I have encountered a brick wall of abject ignorance and naught but argumentum ad hominem, exhibited by profoundly viscious and stupid persons; I am sick of it here; stop accosting me and, there will be no further basis for me to respond...