Debate the Issues is precisely where my OP is posted! Look closely.
Wow, I absolutely do not recall doing that pubication! No matter how I present the position I am obligated to set forward, others incessantly posit an elsewhere where I should be! Which strikes me as so futile and absurd that it is totally incredible. As you can see, the treatise is now paired-down to a very brief minimal presentation, so I have, in a real sense, somewhat simplified and reduced wordage. No one is willing to allow me to be me, and, all prefer that I be elsewhere in some sphere which they imagine to be the proper and ideal place for me to exist, while, all the while, I cannot be this other which everyone insists I be!
I am so totally inundated with insult and abuse here on this horrid law site that I am completely deviated off of my course, which is discussion of the peaceful theoretical destruction of the fundamental presupposition entertained by law/jurisprudence; most members here are responding in such radically horrid, stupid and barbaric a manner that one cannot possibly maintain one's civility among these ignorant hateful destructive savages. I sincerely appreciate your kind and civil manner. I keep posting and posting my thought expecting to perhaps encounter a civil and informed person or persons with whom I can have a productive and civilized interchange/dialectic, concerning what I deem to be a very viable and significant critique of the notion of law per se. Thank you Sir.Wow, I absolutely do not recall doing that pubication! No matter how I present the position I am obligated to set forward, others incessantly posit an elsewhere where I should be! Which strikes me as so futile and absurd that it is totally incredible. As you can see, the treatise is now paired-down to a very brief minimal presentation, so I have, in a real sense, somewhat simplified and reduced wordage. No one is willing to allow me to be me, and, all prefer that I be elsewhere in some sphere which they imagine to be the proper and ideal place for me to exist, while, all the while, I cannot be this other which everyone insists I be!
I am so totally inundated with insult and abuse here on this horrid law site that I am completely deviated off of my course, which is discussion of the peaceful theoretical destruction of the fundamental presupposition entertained by law/jurisprudence; most members here are responding in such radically horrid, stupid and barbaric a manner that one cannot possibly maintain one's civility among these ignorant hateful destructive savages. I sincerely appreciate your kind and civil manner. I keep posting and posting my thought expecting to perhaps encounter a civil and informed person or persons with whom I can have a productive and civilized interchange/dialectic, concerning what I deem to be a very viable and significant critique of the notion of law per se. Thank you Sir.
P.S.; I do not use a thesaurus! I own my vocabulary and it simply upsurges spontaneously. The OP is now as paired-down as it can currently be, and, I am not writing for dummies; anyone genuinely concerned with fathoming my original thought, must rise to the task via study, and, not cry like little sissy girls, bemoaning their inability to instantly comprehend an original theoretical destruction of law.
P.S.; I do not use a thesaurus! I own my vocabulary and it simply upsurges spontaneously. The OP is now as paired-down as it can currently be, and, I am not writing for dummies; anyone genuinely concerned with fathoming my original thought, must rise to the task via study, and, not cry like little sissy girls, bemoaning their inability to instantly comprehend an original destruction of law.

