All well and good, Bud, but I saw nothing in the NM case law that makes a distinction either because the employee breached the contract or because the employee was terminated for cause, and those two things are different. You are, I think, grasping at straws now on this one because you don't like that the employee might still be subject to a contract after being terminated. It rubs you the wrong way. But I have case law in NM showing termination did not render the agreement unenforceable which I have provided to you and you have yet to show me any NM case law making the distinction you now wish to make. So show me a case where the NM courts make that distinction. Otherwise, I don't see that your distinction holds up.

