Many people are aquitted of crimes (or have their charges dismissed). They are not entitled to be "made whole."
Is the term "innocent until proven guilty" a false statement?
Example: If the police have enough evidence to make an arrest (which isn't much) but not enough evidence to proceed to trial, and they drop the charges, is that person never innocent of those original charges that were dropped?
Innocence is a presumption. It's also immaterial to David's rants. Even if he was found innocent, pardoned by the president, and God himself opened up the skies and cast a beam of light on him, THERE'S NO OBLIGATION ON THE STATE'S PART TO MAKE HIM "WHOLE." That's not how the justice system works. That's not how any of this works.