In the beginning of the bk case, the stay was lifted to allow another creditor to proceed in his state court based on personal injury claims and using somax test. I'm going to take that angle and use my pro se ignorance to the fullest extent that the law will allow to excuse any delay in filing my motion. I also have claims of fraud and malicious intent that the court may find as non-discharged under 11 U.S. Code § 523 and let them go forward. I also have a state law claim which if I'm reading case law correctly, that must be heard in my state. Just to provide more information, I'm a consumer creditor. The debtors bk has been in a few online industry publications but it hasn't made huge headlines as far as I know. To that extent, limited relief from the stay has already been granted to defend counterclaims by the debtors and buyers of the debtors estate.

