Quote Quoting cdwjava
View Post

You can disagree all you ant, and even think I'm obtuse. But, the law does not have to conform to YOUR way of thinking. It just does not. You do not have to agree with the application of the law for it to be in effect. As I said, I cannot say whether or not the state can meet the burden of proof, but experience tells me that a large number of emails is sufficient for a conviction. But, it will depend upon the content of the messages as well as the time frame. I suspect if you berated, insulted, and cursed out the judge that they will easily fall into the section of PC 653m.
While I did insult her, I was also venting and attempting to convey how messed up the whole situation was. Insulting her was part of venting. Anyway, I really don't care about it, like I said. I've also insulted you. As far as the law goes, it depends on the county a lot. I've done far worse to a neighbor in San Joaquin county, and the cops told the neighbor to put me on ignore. They didn't even come and talk to me about it. I was waiting because I had my own grievances. A cop in my county even thinks the Sacramento courts just make up their own laws. *shrugs* Regardless of how a jury decided, I would still call it dumb. Right isn't dictated by what a herd of sheep think.

Quote Quoting cdwjava
View Post
I do not believe that PC 653m is a disqualifying conviction for any medical licensing.
It requires an appeal process to get certified with any misdemeanor. If it wasn't for that, I might have just pleaded guilty to get the idiots off my back.