If I cared about what you thought of me, I might actually weep. But, your liking me or not does not change the facts of YOUR situation - or, the law.
Sure you did! If you had not intended to annoy or harass her, you would not have a sent a bunch of insulting or annoying emails!The law requires that I had the intent to harass, which I did not.
Sure you care, that's why you're here! It's at the forefront of your mind and it keeps lingering on and on without resolution! Welcome to the judicial system, by the way. Nothing happens quickly.Anyway, I don't even really care about that. The judge is being a big baby, and it's not a big deal to me.
You think so? Nothing is certain. And such a diversion will have its own set of rules ... not to mention the fact that you might also be subject to a TRO or CPO that could further restrict your actions.I'll be getting out of the charge via a mental health diversion,
Nope. But, attitude can get you in trouble - as you have seen. Andm, taking actions based upon that attitude (like zapping a judge with a bunch of harassing and annoying emails) can get you in legal trouble.Anyway, much is from my attitude, but guess what. Having an attitude isn't illegal.
READ the TRO/CPO ... it will tell you if there are search conditions in it or not. I have never in my life and career (going on 30 years) heard of search conditions in a TRO/CPO, and I cannot find any authorizing law in the relevant code sections. That doesn't mean that my 2 minute read is an in-depth review of the subject, and I'd be curious if it such a condition is actually there or not.Edit: Again, this is about trying to understand the details of what search and seizure nonsense in the context that it was given to me, and whether that's a violation of the 4th amendment. The rest of it? It's not meant to be a topic, but I'm easily provoked into it.

