Has she filed a change of address with the post office?
Has she filed a change of address with the post office?
That rationale makes no sense. She has a lease on an apartment in another town. Whether she tries to use the absurd argument that it's just a storage unit or not, its still a domicile.
That is kind of irrelevant.given the wife has been allowed to dine with the family I don’t see a concern regarding the children as stated in the opinion cited.
All of this is potentially problematic but its not up to us to determine that. The OP needs a consult with a local attorney.as to the eavesdropping: it is clearly illegal to intercept the conversations of another without their permission. . It is also illegal to disclose the illegally obtained conversation as well. I don’t see how you can even suggest it is far fetched. Can you state a basis under which the eavesdropping would be lawful?
As to the gps tracking: it can be unlawful. Not enough info to call it here but it isn’t wise to walk into court with information that might have been obtained unlawfully. It also depends on what he is using the info for. There are both privacy issues and a concern of possible stalking. Op needs to speak with his attorney about the matter.
I understand your points budwad but the op is ignoring the possibilities entirely. That isn’t a smart move. He has a lawyer and should be addressing these issues with his lawyer who has access to all of the facts at hand.
And regardless of whether the guy can be prosecuted for either issue: a judge can take offense to the actions and make life difficult for,the op. He needs to be concerned with how the judge views his actions as much as the legality of them.
youve seen the lease? So far all the op has stated is he believes wife has a lease. He has no proof. Wife has denied having a new domicile. Additionally, you can lease 100 apartments and only one is your domicile. It takes more than a lease to make it a domicile.
No, allowing the wife into the home is not irrelevant, especially if she invited herself and the op made no objection to entering without permission. If she let herself in and op did not object, it would appear op believes wife has the right to enter the home without permission such as when it is your domicile.
And ya, if you read my posts you will see I said he needs to address these issues with his attorney.
So in the end your post provides nothing.
Im sorry you do not understand the definition of a domicile and how you can rent or own multiple residential units but they may or may not be your domicile.
And again; I suggested the op speak with his attorney long before you decided you wanted to argue and trying to chastise me by posting a useless post that provided no benefit.