My question involves labor and employment law for the state of: kansas
After an accident at work, a hair follicle drug test was performed, with positive results, and subsequently fired. I have a spotless work safety history, no absenteeism, positive reviews over the past 9 years. And I was deemed, not entitled to receive unemployment benefits. Ks statute States that for a drug test to be conclusive evidence of impairment I levels are above stated levels. Which mine are, but it also states that the test "chemical test" shall include, but is not limited to, tests of urine, blood or saliva; .
Being that they only have hair test, but no blood, urine, saliva. should my appeal have a chance?