Quote Quoting latigo
View Post
Are you aware that the OP is not named as a respondent or party to the RO application? If so, do you know of any competent legal authority that would extend the litigation privilege to cover allegations slandering a person having no interest in the proceedings?

Also, if so, how would you propose to show that the libelous per se misconduct allegedly attributed to the OP in any way serves to achieving the object of the litigation; to-wit: the issuance of a protective order enjoining the complained conduct of another person.
In the first post it does seem as though serious accusations were made against the OP in the original complaint. Therefore I don't think that we can rule out the OP being a defendant. He needs to have a local attorney review the complaint.