Flyingron,
See that's my interpretation too but why does Judge Jason A. Clay of the Alameda County Court say that the "Senior Zone" is material here?
https://www.dailyjournal.com/mcle/38...-are-necessary
Where in the law is this supported?
LegalWriter,
That's not my question. My question is the title of this post and more specifically why.Quoting LegalWriter
EDIT: I figured it out, I was reading the law wrong. Because the placement of the commas this part should read "provided by this code provided or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352" all at once. This means that only prima facie limits established/provided by 22352b1, 22354, 22357, 22358, 22358.3 are subject to anti speed trap laws. Which means that senior zones are not subject to them.

