This was your statement.
Whatever you think of those comments by Republicans saying that at present they would not vote for removal, it certainly would NOT be treason.
i never said nor suggested it would be.
i didn’t say the senators in question not convicting trump would be treason.
I said this;
In other words, they have clearly stated, prior to any articles being filed so they could not possibly be aware of the charges contained, they would exonerate trump. That alone should be considered treason.
im surprised you find my statement and your interpretation congruent. I spoke to their actions regarding their intent to specifically render a judgment of no guilt regardless of what the articles may contain.
That would be comparable to a judge saying the next guy that walks into his courtroom is not guilty regardless of any evidence against him. It is in absolute conflict with the duties and obligations the parties are charged with fulfilling. In essence the senators supporting such statements have rendered aid to what could be an enemy of the state which is treason.
Now, if you wish to educate me on why it wouldn’t apply as trump is not considered to be an enemy of the sate I’m more than open to such. It may simply be my bias against him but I see trump as the worst president of my life, no question about it. He has twisted the concepts of our laws and Constitution into pretzels. He is without question the most divisive president, and with no valid basis for such division, that I’ve seen.

