Quote Quoting BooRennie
View Post
Embarrassed? No. Unwilling to be harassed/vilified by those who don't like the current President? Yes.
Quote Quoting jk
View Post
the perpetrators? So Rod Rosenstein will be arrested and charged? Hmmmm.

When will republicans accept the investigation was pushed forward during chumps tenure and by republican actors.

Im at a loss as to the innocent until proven guilty statement. That is why an investigation was undertaken prior to filing any charges. There were multiple charges against multiple people with multiple convictions stemming from the investigation which that alone proves the investigation was neither a hoax or a witch hunt.

And if prosecutors don’t exonerate, why oh why is Trump standing on a Muellers investigation and report claiming that exonerated him? Can chump not decide if a prosecutor does exonerate or not? The fact is, any investigation can be used to exonerate whether it be by a man on the street or a federal special investigator that has also been granted the power of prosecution. I am really missing the point of The statement itself since yes, muellers investigation itself could have been the basis for exonerating trump but it specifically, in those precise terms, did not exonerate chump. And the reason it didn’t exonerate chump? Because evidence of chumps criminal activity was discovered and included in the report.

Ya see, mueller was not a prosecutor. He was a special investigator. As a secondary power he was granted the power of prosecution (read the letter of authority I linked previously) to follow through with evidence of crimes that were uncovered by his investigation.


I have found the trumpturds actually the greatest aggressors currently. I have seen some claiming dems to not be citizens. I’ve seen calls for the destruction of the democratic party as well as the people themselves (as in yes, they are enemies and need to be dealt with as an enemy of our country would be dealt with aka death)

not saying there isn’t such activity by the dems somewhere but personally I have not seen it.


Rasmussen is notorious for being the poll most favorable to chump. They tend to have republican bias. Check out other polls that are not specifically known for their bias.

But higher at this point in his tenure is less important than trumps current
status of being 10 points behind Biden by a Fox poll asking who would you vote for today (39% v. 49%)


i tend to agree on the impeachment statement since the republican senate has already stated they will act in a treasonous manner and dispense with the impeachment without taking their actions seriously but instead summarily dismiss the process without performing their duties as intended under the US Constitution. In other words, they have clearly stated, prior to any articles being filed so they could not possibly be aware of the charges contained, they would exonerate trump. That alone should be considered treason.
Quote Quoting BooRennie
View Post
Really? You can say this and keep a straight face with your own hypocrisy flying in the breeze?
Quote Quoting jk
View Post
I’m less worried about what chump wants to call fake news but more concerned about our fake president. His lies are boundless.

Hey, what happened to chump stating he would release his tax returns but he couldn’t because he was under audit (a lie in itself). Not only has he impeded congress in their power to demand his returns (and it has recently been shown this law has been used recently in similar fashion so chumps defenses fail) but the new New York laws allowing for the demand of chumps returns. Chump is challenging the law arguing it violates his constitutional rights (a quite childish argument was put forth in the court filing).

All of his protestation simply proves he lied from the get go and never had any intent to provide his tax returns. Why didn’t he just say that to begin with? Oh, maybe it would have woken a few people to chumps tactics of lying to impress the less alert of the populace. Seems the shepherd has been successful is steering his flock.


I can say what? Reporting my actual reading on the subject? Of course I can.

And I challenge you to prove hypocrisy on my part. I have steadfastly opposed chump.

Ya see, I don’t claim to be a Democrat or a republican nor do I pigeon hole myself as conservative or liberal. I make my decisions on a case by case review of the question at hand. If that puts me in a category, then that’s apparently where my views put me on that matter but only that matter.
I'm not wasting any more time on you. You've made my point for me and you're now trying to back out/obfuscate/deflect. Not happening.