Down the rabbit hole is a saying, and is in no way a negative statement. Rather than trying to explain what it means by my writing, I will use the Google definition of the term.
My comment was to suggest that you had entered the realm of arguing who posted what and who was a troll. This has nothing to do with law. You are being sucked in to the rabbit hole.go down the rabbit hole. To enter into a situation or begin a process or journey that is particularly strange, problematic, difficult, complex, or chaotic, especially one that becomes increasingly so as it develops or unfolds. (An allusion to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll.)
Your posts have always been about the law. Now, I see this latest post about the poster. So down the rabbit hole you go.
However, it is about bad and inconsistent 'law' advice that is given here.
As said before, if that cyclist came here and described what he did, you wouldn't need any "more information" than what you already know. You would tell him he didn't have a case. And you would be wrong.
So, what is this "missing information" you are looking for that would make the crew liable? I know, the construction crew really hit him with a crane and knocked him into the whole...but the court documents left that part out.