I'm not sure what your motion #1 is trying to say. The officer doesn't need "knowledge" of the calibration. He's only performing a operation test of the unit NOT a calibration. The calibration on WSP radars is provided elsewhere (yours was done in November of 2017, which is within the two year standard).

Again, he needs not make that statement, the calibration evidence exists outside of his testimony. In fact, it's about the only admissible evidence on the states part other than his statement.