My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: WA
I was cited for failure to stop at a stop sign.
Via email I've negotiated to ammend the infraction to a non-moving violation in hopes this will keep my insurance from going up. The prosecutor has offered me my choice of either expired tabs or violation of the seatbelt statute with a penalty of $136.
Any reason I'm not aware of to choose one over the other?
I figure either:
1) It doesn't matter.
2) Maybe the seatbelt one could still hurt my insurance so I'll choose the tabs.
Thanks in advance for any help.
For the record, I'm ineligible for a deferred.
(Replying because I forgot to subscribe to this thread.)