Quote Quoting llworking
View Post
Go back and re-read what you wrote. The implication was strong that you felt that the tenant was responsible.
Responsible for removing or repairing (or having it removed or repaired) - we don't know what the lease says about exterior structural issues but I think it's unlikely that a lease would impose such responsibility on a tenant, though I suppose it's possible.

Liability for an injury under negligence law is what I think PG1067 was referring to and that's a different story.