My question involves business law in the state of: Iowa
I have first-hand experience with a criminal assault on a renter of a private residence where the outcome is nonsense and threatening to me, since I am interested in owning or renting a private residence myself. This probably relates to any rental living accommodation.
Under what circumstances can the unilateral word of a private homeowner be used by police/Sheriff to break in to a back door of the residence (including banging on windows and shouting) and then arresting the occupant whose only known interaction with said police/public was to demand immediate cease and desist, and removal of all non-invited personnel from the premises. Assume a law-abiding residential front with front door is available and made known to responders by the irate landlord who stipulated (on a previous 911 crime responder visit) that any future visit by responders be made only to his own lawful address next-door to that of the renter assaulted. Assume the criminal assault does include 911 trespassing calls by aforementioned insane homeowner in prior years, and also includes the public claims of the homeowner that the public road along which the renter's and other's private residences are lawfully addressed is somehow rightfully at his own disposal.
How is the public expected to protect themselves (myself) from police attacking private homes on the baseless 911 demands of a rich landowner?