Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 99
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7,297

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Quote Quoting pg1067
    View Post
    And yet they call us "sheeple."
    I know, it's pretty baaaad.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Ceres ca
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    I travel every day on the public roads and i havent had tags on my vehicle since 2006, the fact is that it isnt required to register your vehicle unless your conducting commerce i.e taxi cab bus ect. Look it up

    We Are Change
    U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS NO LICENSE NECESSARY TO DRIVE AUTOMOBILE ON PUBLIC ROADS
    Posted by Jeffrey Phillips | Jul 21, 2015 |

    U.S. Supreme Court Says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Roads


    U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS
    “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”

    Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –

    Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

    Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”

    Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”



    Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”

    Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”

    Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

    House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.

    Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”

    Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;

    Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”

    -American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”

    -International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”

    -City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232 “Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled” – Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20 ”



    The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”

    Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;

    Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”

    Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163 “the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all.” –

    Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

    Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

    Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”

    Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 “Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 “RIGHT — A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”

    City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. “A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639. “The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.”

    Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.”

    Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972). “If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void.” –

    Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority.” Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O’Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887. “The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.”

    (Paul v. Virginia). “[T]he right to travel freely from State to State … is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” (U.S. Supreme Court,

    Shapiro v. Thompson). EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. …’Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.’

    Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.

    Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41 Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14. “The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187. “a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel “Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”

    Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. “Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.”

    Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is not a “statute.” A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.

    Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages.

    Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29. …automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v. Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354.

    Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen.

    Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. 677, 197 Mass. 241, 246;

    Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158. “A soldier’s personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’

    U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235” 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. “[I]t is a jury question whether … an automobile … is a motor vehicle[.]”

    United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983). Other right to use an automobile cases: –

    EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160 –

    TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 – WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 – CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44 – THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 – U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) –

    GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) – CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 –

    SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) – CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence. Some citations may be paraphrased.

    This article first appeared on SomeNextLevelShit.com and was authored by Jeffrey Phillips.



    OH YEAH, since we are not corporate or government owned help us out here.

    YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

    WE GRATEFULLY ACCEPT CRYPTO COINS
    Dash – XiZebHViTKxjngJ8U8Gekbz34XDcMjKe29
    Bitcoin – 1F6oeUnhXfr5UMC95apbJg7CLjm3BUrT8V
    ETH – 0x9124589c4eAD555F04a7214214c86EA80E129abB

    FOLLOW WEARECHANGE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    WEARECHANGE MERCHANDISE
    https://wearechange.org/store

    https://teespring.com/stores/wearechange/

    SHARE:

    RATE:

    12345
    PREVIOUS‘Six Californias’ plan may make 2016 ballotNEXTFormer general Wesley Clark calls for sending “radicalized Americans” to concentration camps
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Jeffrey Phillips
    Jeffrey Phillips

    JOIN WE ARE CHANGE!

    YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS


    FOLLOW US
    Facebook
    585,000+
    Followers
    Twitter
    74,100+
    Followers
    YouTube
    508,582+
    Followers
    Instagram
    12,400+
    Followers
    Google+
    3,600+
    Followers
    RSS
    6,100+
    Followers
    POST ARCHIVE

    BLOG CATEGORIES

    Sponsored by Revcontent
    ALSO TRENDING
    Girl Breaks Down at Thought of Becoming a Grown-up
    Top 10 Fortnite Fan Theories
    Little Girl Smiles Every Time She Wakes Up
    Newborn Goats Have Ridiculously Cute Pajama Party
    Girl Breaks Down at Thought of Becoming a Grown-up
    @LUKEWEARECHANGE
    RT @LionelMedia: This is the President of the European Commission. https://t.co/RFTEo5Zd4R, 3 hours ago
    RT @zerohedge: WikiLeaks May Sue Conspiracy Theorist Louise Mensch https://t.co/rdDG5qD97e, 3 hours ago
    Follow @Lukewearechange

    Dash:
    XcPhuoDDU1mTj7Lq9Zet1Tz3VDCnjUtgGu


    Bitcoin:
    39PjjE4qR2nmujq3VCgBMKPBRntcmfc3or


    Bitcoin Cash:
    17amnWLWaQWwBCw1W9GBFAni53Vhb5DCsD


    EOS:
    0x2da36f3035fd4e02b4c15a17cde9e5abe70cd314


    Ethereum:
    0x9124589c4eAD555F04a7214214c86EA80E129abB


    PIVX:
    DRDETAB6Vn9DvpLCTEDqewE97i3Z1WvR9S



    © 2018 WE ARE CHANGE
    WEBSITE BY DAVE CAHILL | DAVECAHILL.COM

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7,297

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    I wouldn't give so much as a penny to that group. None of those cases stands for the proposition they say they do. They are misrepresenting the law and unfortunately getting suckers like you to buy into it.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Ceres ca
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    You asked for proof and i gave it to you .admit your wrong or keep looking like a jackass that you are

    The purpose is to inform the people that they dont have to be taken advantage of by the state and local law enforcment , you dont have to have a license to operate a vechicle on any public highway unless your conducting commerce. The state makes billions on bogus fines that people think they have to pay for somthing that is a god given right

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    15,411

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Quote Quoting jhceres
    View Post
    You asked for proof and i gave it to you .admit your wrong or keep looking like a jackass that you are

    The purpose is to inform the people that they dont have to be taken advantage of by the state and local law enforcment , you dont have to have a license to operate a vechicle on any public highway unless your conducting commerce. The state makes billions on bogus fines that people think they have to pay for somthing that is a god given right
    And the groups you are talking about make millions from saps like you. Nobody in any position of authority nor any court is going to back you up. What is going to happen is that you are either going to end up spending time in jail, or you are going to wise up.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    207

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Ceres, copying and pasting is not a legal argument with merit. For instance what is this citation??

    Swift v City of Topeka 43

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    20,319

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Quote Quoting jhceres
    View Post
    You asked for proof and i gave it to you .admit your wrong or keep looking like a jackass that you are

    The purpose is to inform the people that they dont have to be taken advantage of by the state and local law enforcment , you dont have to have a license to operate a vechicle on any public highway unless your conducting commerce. The state makes billions on bogus fines that people think they have to pay for somthing that is a god given right
    Even after your claptrap was refuted in this thread, and this thread (through a quite thorough breakdown by Taxing Matters), you still insist that your "proof" is valid. Not to mention that there is not and never has been some massive exoneration of traffic offenders based upon this fallacious legal theory.

    So, if you refuse to take note of legal facts and reality, just who is the "jackass"?
    **********
    Retired Cal Cop Sergeant & Teacher

    Seek justice,
    Love mercy,
    Walk humbly with your God

    -- Courageous, by Casting Crowns ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkM-gDcmJeM

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Ceres ca
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    That is the guy who was arrested for riding a bicycle on the sidewalk as well as a bridge .
    I believe his case was overturned by the supreme court

    Many and most people are unaware that the state is committing a crime by ordering that one must pay to travel on public roads, thats why there is no wave of people as you say .But soon there will be a tsunami of pissed off citizen's that are tired of the government lying and stealing there money

    Its a well known fact that most not all but most people in law enforcment "cops" are of average or below avarage intelligence so they dont understand that there breaking the law when they cite you for no license

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    207

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Quote Quoting jhceres
    View Post
    That is the guy who was arrested for riding a bicycle on the sidewalk as well as a bridge .
    By asking what was that case, I did not mean the facts of it.

    Again your answer is NON legal in nature. Swift v. City of Topeka 43, is NOT a legal citation. IF you expect to base a legal argument on a case, cite it in FULL, which is; Swift v. City of Topeka 43 Kan 671.

    This shows your TRUE lack of understanding of the law and what it means.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    15,411

    Default Re: You Don't Need a Drivers License to Travel on Public Roadway

    Quote Quoting jhceres
    View Post
    That is the guy who was arrested for riding a bicycle on the sidewalk as well as a bridge .
    I believe his case was overturned by the supreme court

    Many and most people are unaware that the state is committing a crime by ordering that one must pay to travel on public roads, thats why there is no wave of people as you say .But soon there will be a tsunami of pissed off citizen's that are tired of the government lying and stealing there money

    Its a well known fact that most not all but most people in law enforcment "cops" are of average or below avarage intelligence so they dont understand that there breaking the law when they cite you for no license
    ROTFLMAO!! You are more deliciously clueless than most of the "sovereigns" are.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Driver's License Issues: Do I Need a Second Drivers License
    By Ashmore in forum Driver's Licenses
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-21-2015, 02:56 PM
  2. Driver's License Issues: Will I Be Able to Get My Drivers License After Getting an MIP
    By BMONEY in forum Driver's Licenses
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-24-2012, 05:13 AM
  3. Traffic Lane Violations: Wheels Off Roadway Ticket, Effect on Restricted License
    By Pascal in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-23-2011, 09:05 AM
  4. Suspension and Revocation: Drivers License Suspended in Michigan for Unpaid Drivers Responsibility Fees
    By onrof in forum Driver's Licenses
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-19-2011, 08:12 AM
  5. Unlawful Presence and Overstay: Getting A Drivers License
    By Jamar in forum Immigration Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 06:31 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources