didn't mean to sound argumentative to all and I do understand what y'all are saying. I just don;t agree with it and that's my right as a US citizen dammit


The odd part is the sheriff did not come onto the property. As protection for the health worker, I would presume he had every right to accompany the woman. Not in an investigatory manner but as protection for the woman only. Not sure how any evidence seen would be handled but that is another thread.

Obviously, this entire situation was handled poorly. I believe the sheriff did not know what actually was allowable and what wan;t. Both of the gov. employees should have had more direction and support from the local district attorney;s office or even the states AG. This could have gotten real ugly if the landowner was just a bit more off kilter mentally. If a gov employee chooses to take an action, they should be very well informed as to it's correctness and be able to articulate that to the citizen involved. The sheriff simply repeating the "if you don;t have anything to hide" BS makes him look like he feels he is in the wrong. He needs to be able to state support for the actions, even if that meant coming back a different day.

want a laugh? spellcheck accepted "y'all" and "dammit" without question. The program writer must be from the south