Results 1 to 10 of 12

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Will a Bank Notify an Account Holder About a Subpoena

    My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: NY (NYC)

    I've been thinking about money judgment enforcement strategies and hoping someone can help me with this question.

    Let's say I send an Information Subpoena or Subpoena Duces Tecum to judgment debtors bank without a restraining notice.

    Will the bank notify the debtor of either enforcement tool?

    I dont want to tip off the debtor.

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,069

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    What does "without a restraining notice" mean?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    Are banks required to notify its clients that it received an information subpoena (without restraining notice)? If not required, is it customary for them to do so?

    We can send an information subpoena by itself or information subpoena with restraining notice. A restraining notice will freeze the funds in the account and definately requires notice to judgment debtor. I'm wondering if info subpoena by itself will trigger a similar notification. If not, then judgment debtor will not be tipped off and element of surprise can be mantained.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    17,616

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    Quote Quoting AlwaysOnTime
    View Post
    A restraining notice will freeze the funds in the account and definately requires notice to judgment debtor.
    Then you would get the money.

    Seems foolish to me not to just levy the account and get the money.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,069

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    Quote Quoting AlwaysOnTime
    View Post
    Not at all. It's a very legitimate question. Are banks required to notify its clients that it received an information subpoena (without restraining notice)? If not required, is it customary for them to do so?
    Well...these are different questions than you previously asked. Typically, the party serving the subpoena is obligated to serve a notice re same on the person whose information is sought. What is or isn't "customary" for banks in New York is something only someone familiar with banking practices in that state could answer.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    Rather not levy without knowing how much is in the account because if the debtor has less than the statutory minimum, I'm not getting a penny but the debtor would be tipped off by the freeze. And I could get a lot of info from the bank with an information subpoena, including debtors assets and address information. Also, information subpoena is cheaper than restraining funds (process server required) and then executing (marshal or sheriff) on the funds. An information subpoena can simply be faxed, mailed or dropped off at the bank although I tend to send then certified mail/return receipt requested.

    I dont know of any NYC requirement for creditor to notify debtor when an information subpoena is issued to a 3rd party.

    Please allow me to add that, in NYC, duces tecums are required to be served by process server but the question stands: is a bank in NYC required to notify the debtor that it received such a request? I dont think so, but want to make sure.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    3,671

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    The debtor is going to be "tipped off" when you sue them and get a judgment.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7,713

    Default Re: Information Subpoenas/Duces Tecum

    Quote Quoting AlwaysOnTime
    View Post
    My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: NY (NYC)

    I've been thinking about money judgment enforcement strategies and hoping someone can help me with this question.

    Let's say I send an Information Subpoena or Subpoena Duces Tecum to judgment debtors bank without a restraining notice.

    Will the bank notify the debtor of either enforcement tool?
    You can pretty well bet that the bank will do that and indeed it is likely that the applicable law requires that either you send the debtor notice or that the bank must do that in order to allow the debtor the chance to seek to quash the subpoena if the subpoena is improper. When I was an officer for the IRS and issued summons to banks they always notified the account holder of the summons. Of course I also provided a copy of the summons to the taxpayer as well, as the law required it. There was just no way that the account holder wasn't going to find out about that in a civil proceeding. The banks did that with all legal process they got on account holders unless a law or court order prevented them from doing so, which normally you see only in criminal cases.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Civil Procedure Issues: How to Subpoena Bank Account Information from a Third Party
    By trosoft in forum Civil Procedure
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-15-2017, 06:59 PM
  2. Banking: Account Holder Flagged by Bank Due to Forgery
    By kathiie39 in forum Personal Finance And Investment Law
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-19-2015, 09:25 AM
  3. Banking: Rights to a Joint Bank Account After the Death of an Account Holder
    By lawguest26 in forum Personal Finance And Investment Law
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-17-2014, 11:52 AM
  4. Banking: Money Stolen By Joint Bank Account Holder
    By TTT in forum Personal Finance And Investment Law
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-07-2008, 04:21 PM
  5. Banking: Bank Error in Favor of Account Holder
    By zif123 in forum Personal Finance And Investment Law
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-24-2005, 12:02 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources