If I'm interpreting this right, what she did can be considered a possible crime under PA law. Under definitions, it lists labor as one of the services. Which is what we were charging her for. And I interpret #4 to be what she did. She obtained our services by deception, she wrote the check and put the stop payment on it the same day. She had no intention of ever allowing the bank to process the check. But as someone else pointed out that can be hard to prove. However, since my sentences are only to scare her and I can interpret the law that way, I'm still leaning towards leaving those sentences in...

