He would have to do a much better job explaining the facts. It's not clear why the women would have agreed to continue the fight in a different location. If "the vigilants use their batons against the women" means that the security guards hit the women with batons while they were fighting, it's not clear why the women would have tolerated that behavior or continued fighting.
If the question is whether the employer of the security company would have grounds to fire the company based upon this type of behavior, obviously "yes".

