My question involves criminal law for the state of: Florida - Federal Court

FRCP Rule 42 Federal Criminal Contempt is described here
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_42

1. Opposing Counsel filed a Motion for an Order to Show Cause, Concerning Criminal Contempt ("Contempt Motion")

2. The Judge issued an Order to Show Cause, as to why I should not be held in criminal contempt ("Contempt Order").

I filed an "Omnibus Motion" to:

a) vacate the Contempt Order, b) more definitive statement, c) correct court mistakes, and d) enlargement of time

The Contempt Motion 1. is still pending, the Judge has not ruled either way yet, the Judge will give me a lot of time to come back to Florida, for the hearing, and the related hearing was never scheduled. There was a bench warrant, but that was vacated and there is no bench warrant any longer. However before the hearing, I'd like to know if I'm right and the Judge is wrong.

3. FRCP Rule 42 was violated, so I informed the Court,

Rule 42 (a)(1)(A), "state the time and place of the trial;"

I said,

"If the Court intended to issue a valid Notice of criminal proceeding, they must include the date and time of the trial. There was no date and time of any scheduled trial or of the required preliminary hearing.".

Am I right that the Court Order was improper, since it violated 42(a)(1)(A)?

FRCP Rule 42 was violated, so I informed the Court,

Rule 42 (a)(1)(C), "state the essential facts constituting the charged criminal contempt and describe it as such."

I filed the Motion for more Definitive Statement asking for details of the essential facts.

Am I right that the Court Order was improper, if it didn't "state the essential facts"?

Rule 42 (a)(2), "Appointing a Prosecutor. The court must request that the contempt be prosecuted by an attorney for the government, unless the interest of justice requires the appointment of another attorney. If the government declines the request, the court must appoint another attorney to prosecute the contempt.".

The Court has not yet appointed a prosecutor.

Rule 42 (3) "Trial and Disposition. A person being prosecuted for criminal contempt is entitled to a jury trial in any case in which federal law so provides".

A trial has not yet been scheduled.

Background. It was concerning disrespect and criticism of the Judge and I never consented to allowing the Judge to be involved. In the initial scheduled hearing the same Judge was scheduled to be present.

Rule 42 (3) "If the criminal contempt involves disrespect toward or criticism of a judge, that judge is disqualified from presiding at the contempt trial or hearing unless the defendant consents.".

Is it correct that the Judge should have also been prevented from being at the hearing?

If someone agree with me (at least on some points), I'll try to hire/retain a Florida Federal Attorney, who has experience in opposing FRCP Rule 42. Criminal Contempt, but they must be willing to call the Judge's acts apparent Fraud Upon the Court, if the Attorney agrees with me. They don't have to be near the Court House, West Palm Beach, since most problems can be resolved via discovery, then I can have a different WPB Attorney at the hearing (but I don't think there will be a hearing).